Two Sides of the Same Coin Essay Example

Cut out of the same cloth Paper Investigate the adjustment in character of Michael Henchard all through the novel, the Mayor of Casterbridge Through the whole novel Michael Henchard, his civil office giving the books eponymous title, depicts a tireless variance of character. Initially, we see that he is driven by fierceness and hastiness yet; his cruel abuses reveal a wellspring of adoration profound inside his body. This doesn't just look like his inner conflict, yet in addition fortifies the way that the Mayor of Casterbridges activities have either been fuelled by desire or just drove by destiny. Directly from the earliest starting point, Thomas Hardy proposes that his story will spin around one focal character, as he captions his book: The Life and Death of a Man of Character. However, in this tremendous world, Henchard, a minor drop in the sea, has been singled out and schemed against by fortune. We will compose a custom paper test on Two Sides of the Same Coin explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom exposition test on Two Sides of the Same Coin explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom exposition test on Two Sides of the Same Coin explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer In what some state as the introduction of the novel, parts one and two element the primary curve in Henchards life. The Furmity Scene sees the selling of Susan Henchard to a mariner, who was in secret by the rest. This is thusly, the primary indication of hastiness, which defeats Henchard. It can likewise be inferred that his destiny had gone bad in light of the fact that the bartering was going to end vainly until, at the last possible second, Mr. Newson, by chance had entered the tent inside the last a few minutes and consented to buy Mrs. Susan Henchard for five guineas. Notwithstanding, I imagine this is anything but a reasonable judgment of Henchards character, as he was affected by liquor and his withdrawnness had transformed into intoxicated rage. However, I go to the underlying explanation behind Henchards appreciation for the rum in the furmity. It is glaringly clear that Henchard is miserable. From the crowds eyes, Thomas Hardy portrays the absence of correspondence among a couple, and the quietness they safeguarded. From this and Henchards essential responses, apparently Henchards despairing disposition is because of the way that he has hitched youthful and right now fathers a youngster by the name of Elizabeth Jane. In his detest and endeavor to look for retribution at anything he can consider, Henchard rescues himself by drinking to facilitate his feelings, however this through and through winds up making him more forceful than previously. By and by, Henchards rash and hesitant way drives him to make a vow in this serious spot (the congregation) and he will stay away from every solid alcohol for the space of twenty years to come. However this shows on one side of Henchards coin, there is this unpleasant fervency, anyway it very well may be in a split second flipped over to uncover a feeling of disappointment and regret. It likewise infers that Henchard has a solid confidence in God and that reality that he swears on the holy book proposes that he is good and strict. Besides, the point that he saved his vow for precisely twenty years shows a decided and unflinching character. Aside from his reflecting feeling of personality, two different powers likewise pull Henchard. Like a manikin on strings, Henchard either acts to the solid take of destiny or of desire. The main look at desire is seen when Henchard gets Farfraes letter in the wake of selling his better half eighteen years before that. During that period, Michael had earned a respectable situation in the network: The Mayor of Casterbridge. Having the option to arrive at such a status demonstrates, that Henchard isn't just skillful, yet in addition fit for meeting his objectives throughout everyday life. Not long before tolerating Farfraes letter, Michael Henchard was in the midst of a gathering with individual chamber individuals. His direct, straightforward methodology implied that he enthusiastically conceded, the wheat had turned out seriously. Likewise, his moment response to the note explains that Henchard is still as rash as he used to be almost twenty years prior. The genuine experience with Fa rfrae reveals an admirable exertion from Henchard. He quickly makes a decision about him decidedly. He accepts that if this man (Farfrae) can support him, he should be agreeable. Notwithstanding, Henchards abrupt loving could be because of the tremendous comparability among Farfrae and Henchards poor sibling whos now dead and gone. So accepting is Henchards character, that when Farfrae had rejected his proposal to come back to his home for preferred food over virus ham and beer, Henchard restored the following morning to convince Donald to go under his belt as director of the corn and roughage business. Be that as it may, when Farfrae was at Henchards store, he gently referenced what experiences and will difficulty Henchard for any longer: Should a man turrun against destiny? As Henchards dealings with Farfrae became more grounded and progressively visit, Henchard started to expose his actual sentiments and open accounts of the past. His enjoying and trust in Farfrae drove him to discuss the recollections that obfuscated his dishonorable past. Henchard additionally concedes that he is a forlorn man and has no one else to address. His absence of drinking implies that he gets no opportunity to mingle and subsequently make companions. So at the primary possibility of a genuine companion, Henchard trusts Farfrae pr omptly and reveals to him everything. His steady steadiness drove Farfrae to be employed and simply because Henchard loved Farfrae very much did he feed and safe house him; the person who was to cause Henchard torment and misery. Henchard is fit for indicating limits of feeling in the two bearings. By the by, his savage and obtuse associations with Jopp, just expands the loathe I feel against Henchard. I for one accept that Henchard discovers individuals to utilize, and when he no longer needs them, he disposes of them like junk. A prime case of this is when Henchard rejects Jopps the board offer with the free reason that: Jopp was past the point of no return and as he didn't keep his arrangement, Henchard connected with another supervisor. This hypothesis is additionally connected to the significance of letters in this novel. Letters and his starter reactions towards them, oversee each key occurrence in Henchards life. In his letter to Jopp, Henchard expressed Thursday or Saturday for the arrangement. All things considered, with the possibility of a superior director who may help him in his period of scarcity, Henchard excused the man who he had in the same class as connected and picked Farfrae. With one more letter, Henchard encounters the spouse he repudiated around twenty years prior. Gradually, Susan Newson reenters his life by one of his cleverness plans, which fundamentally implied that through time, Henchard suited the widow Mrs. Newson and her girl. At that point he would meet her, court her, and wed her. This in this way would prompt Susan going into Henchards house, without stimulating any doubt or uncertainty. On one hand, Henchard is making a decent attempt to present appropriate reparations in light of his slip-ups, by guaranteeing that they lease a bungalow. His humility is really acknowledged when he argues for Susans absolution and says: judge me on my future works. In any case, then again, apparently Henchard just acts pleasantly to facilitate his feeling of remorse. Concerning this issue, Henchards honesty is set up when he promptly reveals to Farfrae the new turns throughout his life. His circumstance is currently laid before Farfrae, who Henchard accepts can't just assistance him in his monetary, however social emergency too. After discourteously charging somebody, Henchard is constantly disillusioned about what he has done. Without intuition, he carelessly says what first goes onto his head and when he later has the opportunity to survey his conduct, with diminish fear, he regularly laments a considerable lot of his past slip-ups. This execution of misery includes excessively well in the arrangements and results of the tenth commemoration festivities. To rival Farfraes fast developments, Henchard was not to be classed as a contender no longer available. In his flurry to come top, and recover the position that he felt was gradually sneaking away to Farfrae, Henchard regardless of this, tossed cash into a merriment, which was bound to come up short. So it was to be, Henchards doomed connect to destiny, drove him to one more terrible goof. It was in joining the last parts of Farfraes exhibition, did Henchard say those lethal words: Mr Farfraes time as my supervisor is attracting to a nearby. Immediately, Ha rdy makes it clear that, Henchards wavering feeling of character made his heart sink inside him since his currently passed desirous temper revealed a sharp sentiment of contrition. Henchard was likewise ready to make the dangerous misinterpretation of having the option to pass judgment on the climate. Michael Henchard is frequently connected to Shakespeares Lear, because of the way that the two of them are definitely denied of the ones they cherished in their later life and passing on days. His decency and significance are cut by his horrendous at various times activities. Likewise contrasted with Farmer Boldwood, from Thomas Hardys Far from the Madding Crowd, Henchard scarcely varies. A respectable figure in the public eye presented to general society as a totally extraordinary man. With these connections to the network, I feel Hardy is attempting to show that nothing is ever covered up and it will come out, possibly not currently, however later on. Not to totally judge Henchard on a few his words, I imagined that his fair way towards Farfrae, after the discourteous excusal, depicted his actual feelings. When catching wind of Farfraes overthrow for setting up himself freely, Henchard concurred it was just option to permit Farfrae to have a go at the corn-selling business. This ch oice shows that Henchard is as yet good. We are caused to feel thoughtful towards Henchard when he understands that he is separated from everyone else at home once more. His arrangement of Farfrae as his supervisor was disturbed by his envy. His disdain of a family made him surrender love for aspiration. He figured he could be cheerful when Susan returned, yet she passed on not long after

Have People Become Overly Dependent on Technology? Essay

The idea of how much innovation individuals use every day can be startling as one mulls over. From awakening to our morning timer to resting with the forced air system on we are continually utilizing innovation. The age we live in is known as the time of innovation and the time of â€Å"progress†. Point of fact, innovation has made living a lot simpler as an individual and as a general public. Vehicles, prepares, transports, and planes with cooling and the speed of a hundred ponies has made going under any climate condition incredibly advantageous; so saying innovation has not profited individuals would be unreasonable. Nonetheless, with every one of these advantages and pretty much every errand including the utilization of innovation the inquiry emerges, have individuals gotten excessively reliant on innovation? There is a contrast between being reliant on something, and being excessively subject to something. Simply being reliant on something could imply that quite possibly in the event that it was gone, at that point it would cause the individual no damage, however when somebody is excessively subject to something, at that point the vanishing of the free would hurt the individual. As I would like to think individuals have unquestionably gotten excessively subject to innovation on account of many explanation. Quite a bit of my proof introduced are articles composed, reviews directed, and individual encounters that I have had. Articles have been composed and studies have been directed to discover how ward individuals are on innovation. I am going to introduce statements and confirmations from articles and writing that clarify how innovation has developed in people groups lives and has dominated. Chanie Kirschner presents some intriguing focuses on how individuals are excessively subject to innovation in an article composed not exactly a year back; one of which is â€Å"when the web is down, work is over for the day† this is consistent with an incredible degree (Mobile). Schools have let understudies out early on the grounds that the force was out and no work should be possible. The subsequent point is that â€Å"buyer’s regret is considerably more common.† Internet shopping has become so normal and helpful that individuals areâ forgetting how to deal with money and don't know from which store to purchase a specific thing from any longer since everything can be discovered on the web. The third point is that â€Å"you don’t live in the moment.† He gives a model that a parent goes to see the exhibition of his/her kid and is too occupied with getting the camera to work or is glancing through a screen that the genuine encounter is no more. This likewise implies individuals are amazingly reliant on innovation and advanced media to go anyplace on the planet. Instead of letters and composed articulations individuals rely upon recordings and voice accounts which can undoubtedly be deceivable. The fourth point that Chanie gives is that â€Å"nobody knows aâ phone number.† Cell Phones have become so normal that 90% of American Adults have a mobile phone. As indicated by the above diagram, most of Americans have a cell phone. Cell phones have the ability to contain reports, telephone numbers, GPS and that's only the tip of the iceberg. All which are abilities that individuals rely upon their telephone for, without the telephone individuals would not recall a telephone number or even know step by step instructions to get around in their own city. Understudies are incredibly reliant on spell check and auto right that composing a paper by hand would be amazingly troublesome. The fifth point that was introduced is that â€Å"You are fearing saying a final farewell to your beau face-to-face.† Although Chanie gave an individual model, it can in any case identify with the way that individuals are excessively subject to innovation to speak with others. From connections to online meetings, individuals are overlooking how to speak with others eye to eye. The 6th point that was introduced is that â€Å"Brick and mortar stores are going the method of the dinosaurs.† As I expressed before in the paper, internet shopping has become so helpful that independent companies and markets are failing and online organizations, for example, â€Å"Amazon† and â€Å"Ebay† are blasting. The Final point that Chanie gives is that â€Å"Without your telephone, you fee l naked.† People are not just subject to telephones with their day by day lives however with their wellbeing too. A youngster that has lost his/her mobile phone experiences mental pressure. The discipline for a kid that ten years prior used to be disallowing them to head outside and play is presently takingâ away their hardware. The inquiry to pose to comprehend if individuals are really excessively subject to innovation is, would they say they are ready to live without it? In a survey by CNET, 28 percent of individuals said they wouldn’t have the option to live without fast Internet (America). Innovation is gradually overwhelming people’s lives and is turning into a need instead of a need, similar to the writer of a factious convincing exposition composes, â€Å"Ultimately, we can say that ,†living without innovation resembles living without air† in this specialized universe of today.† An article composed by Ismat Tahseen titled â€Å"How subordinate are we on technology† states â€Å"The review †of 12,000 grown-ups from Brazil, China, France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan and the US †found that about 61% twenty to thirty year olds (those matured 18-24) accept that innovation is right now making individuals less human. It uncovered that in spite of being the advanced local age, 59% of twenty to thirty year olds felt that society has gotten recently excessively dependent on innovation, a site reported† (Times of India). It is evident through the confirmations and writing introduced that individuals are gotten excessively reliant on innovation. The case of schools being closed down is in of itself enough to comprehend that the instruction framework today is so reliant on innovation that it can't proceed without it. Alongside business that can't proceed without coolers or enrolls or even lights. Excessively relying upon somthing or totally relying upon somthing comprise of the failure to proceed without it for instance the GPS that was expressed before. In the event that the GPS quits dealing with an excursion, at that point the individual would need to go to a store close by and request bearings and the one giving headings can unfortunately know a limited amount of a lot. An individual leaves on an excursion completely relying upon his vehicle and GSP and doesn't get ready for the most dire outcome imaginable which would be his vehicle, telephone, and GPS quit working. This is a reasonable sign that individuals are excessively subject to innovation. The general public we live in today has become so quick that individuals must rely upon innovation so as to get by and endure. All the focuses expressed by Chanie interface with the over reliance on innovation and the way that it would be bedlam if all innovation was hacked and all force shutdown. All in all most of individuals themselves concur that individuals are excessively subject to innovation and even 29% of individuals state they can't live without rapid web. Its been expressed that individuals rely upon innovation for data, travel, andâ communication. It was additionally said that schools and organizations can't proceed without innovation. As per the exploration led, plainly individuals have gotten excessively reliant on innovation. Works Cited â€Å"America has gotten excessively reliant on technology.† UAB Kaleidoscope. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 July 2014. . â€Å"Argumentative Essay.† Susan Yaroshevich. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 July 2014. . â€Å"Mobile Technology Fact Sheet.† Pew Research Centers Internet American Life Project RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 June 2014. . â€Å"How subordinate would we say we are on innovation? †The Times of India.† The Times of India. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 July 2014. .

Why I Quit Goodreads

Why I Quit Goodreads A few months ago, I quit Goodreads. Partly, I was paring back my social media life to those that are most useful to me  (Twitter) or make me happiest (Instagram). Partly, I found the Kathleen  Hale controversy  profoundly upsetting. But mostly, I was just sick of being harassed. I was tired of being questioned by authors or rabid fans about my three-star reviews (by the way can we talk about how a three-star review is not a bad review, people?), messaged and spammed and poked at to read someones self-published magnum opus, and invited to everything all over the world always. But those are minor annoyances. The Kathleen Hale controversy snapped into focus something I had always kind of wondered about: as a woman, putting my views on the internet is an act of risk-taking. And this is gendered, folks. I dont think Hale would have stalked a male commentator, and I know my male colleagues here at Book Riot get very different reactions for saying the same things my female colleagues do. This is about being a woman who wants to exercise her voice, and this is about the people who will always read that voice as a threat. Once, a week or so before I deleted my Goodreads account, I gave a book that shall remain nameless a two-star review. A man  claiming to be the authors publicist messaged me to ask that I reconsider. I ignored the message (I never had that many followers on Goodreads and it seemed to me that I was a small potatoes target) and, a day or so later, received an angrier message, this time demanding that I take down the review. I wrote back and noted that I had made some positive points about the book but that overall it didnt work for me. Reviews on Goodreads, I noted, are personal reflections for the most part mine certainly were and I wasnt condemning the book as a whole. The person wrote back and asked, How would you like it if people used the internet to say mean things about you? It can be done, you know. Hm, I thought to myself. Hm. Kathleen Hale just drove to some Goodreads reviewers house. Theres that weird blog for bitching about badly-behaving reviewers. And this guy is being kind of threatening in a way that I dont like. Whats the cost-benefit for me to stick with Goodreads, in this context? So I didnt. I quit. I dont think naming and shaming is appropriate here, because who even knows if that person really was the authors publicist? I didnt write down the name and I didnt look it up. If theres one thing Ive learned, its that book people on the internet can be  crazy. But it doesnt actually matter: what matters is that I felt genuinely unsettled by the aggression with which this person approached me. Goodreads, a central hub of my beloved bookternet, was not safe for me. Events of the last few weeks, many of which youve read about one these pages, got me thinking again about my experience on Goodreads. And it also got me thinking about all the times Ive been talking about books and what I value about them on Twitter only to have men who are complete strangers enter my feed to assail my feminism, my appearance, my body, my voice, my place in the world. At least once a week, now, I block a handful of people and move on. It got me thinking about how often I read articles on book sites (not, blessedly, this one, with its carefully managed community and moderated comments) where I have wanted to join in the discussion, only to read the comment threads full of male aggressions and personal attacks, racism and sexism and threats of violence, and think: no, this is not for me. My voice is not welcome here. At least once a week, now, I scroll past a comment thread and move on. This is a problem that is wider than us in the bookternet but it is, make no mistake, a problem in the bookternet. We were supposed to be the safe space for intellectual discussion of this act of reading that we so love. And yet. Listen, I am not an especially soft person. I came of age on the internet as a member of the forums of SomethingAwful and I know how dark the internet can be. But thats the problem the bookternet wasnt supposed to be SomethingAwful or 4Chan or Red Pill. The bookternet should be a place where we can talk openly about representations of women in literature, about  the unbearable whiteness of publishing, about the need to read diversely. And we should be able to do it, as women, without fearing gendered attacks and silencing. When I say the bookternet is not safe for women, I mean it. Thankfully I have never been physically attacked or directly harmed by my experiences tweeting and blogging about books. But I have certainly been made to feel unsafe, to live on the defensive, to question the motivations of those who engage with me, to block first and ask questions never. Thats not the person I want to be, but its the person I must be if I wish to have a public voice on a big platform like Book Riot. If I have to choose between my sweetness and my voice, my voice will always, always win. It has to. But that doesnt mean  there arent casualties. My Goodreads account was a casualty. Somedays, my sanity and strength feel like they might be the next to go. But its empowering to know that though the bookternet is not safe for women, there are other people who will help me fight to change that. As I was drafting this post, I had a conversation with a woman I find brave and brilliant and wise, but she is currently dealing with on- and off-line aggression of a level I have never had to process. As we talked today, we came to realize that there is a gap between male and female experience: men often do not understand the impact of comments they make on the women who have to hear them.  Just like a man might never think twice about walking down the street at night behind a woman while that woman is wondering if she is being followed, what might seem like a harmless joke from a man to a woman on Twitter may in fact be another threatening second in a day filled with them for that woman. And when the woman expresses anxiety or dismay, the response is, I was joking. You misunderstood me. Im not that guy. This, I think, is an empathy gap, where people who perhaps do not think they mean to aggress do so simply because they are unaware of the power of their words. Lets be clear: you are not the first person to call me a feminist whore on Twitter. Maybe if you were, your words wouldnt have such an impact. But when youre the fifth in a day, or the hundredth in year, then maybe this isnt about me overreacting maybe this is about they way we use language to make discussion scary and inaccessible for women. This isnt unique to the bookternet. But this is something the bookternet must address. So I open it up to you, Book Riot commenters.  The bookternet is not safe for women. What comes next? ____________________ Book Riot Live is coming! Join us for a two-day event full of books, authors, and an all around good time.